<<O>>  Difference Topic HistoricalNotes (r1.4 - 05 Feb 2006 - GaranceDrosehn)

META TOPICPARENT DeveloperGuide
Some misc. historical stuff.
Line: 10 to 10

became SLCP, this proposal was floated. The document it came from had an RCS tag indicating it was written on 29 Nov 1994.
Added:
>
>
-- ThePrisoner - 29 Jan 2004


As to SLCP itself, we seem to have forgotten exactly when the initial work on that was done. SLCP was definitely not in the production (RPI) version of lily as of August 1996. But that same production server was
Line: 17 to 20

full-blown SLCP implementation, but the messages were the same format which is still used for SLCP. It may be that developer versions of a lilyCore had implementations of SLCP well before that.
Added:
>
>

Also, it should be said that we have considered XML at times after we had SLCP implemented. But so far it doesn't seem like it would give us enough benefits over the status quo. Also, due to the way messages are generated in MOO and lilycoreDB, it is important that all data for any single event (such as a message from one user to another) is sent from the server to the client as one single line. Otherwise, data related to different events might be sent to the client in a shuffled fashion: one line of data from "event one", one line from "event two", and then a second line from "event one".

-- GaranceDrosehn - 05 Feb 2006


 <<O>>  Difference Topic HistoricalNotes (r1.3 - 02 Feb 2006 - GaranceDrosehn)

META TOPICPARENT DeveloperGuide
Some misc. historical stuff.
Line: 9 to 9

As a matter of fact - not exactly. But during the development of what became SLCP, this proposal was floated. The document it came from had an RCS tag indicating it was written on 29 Nov 1994.
Added:
>
>

As to SLCP itself, we seem to have forgotten exactly when the initial work on that was done. SLCP was definitely not in the production (RPI) version of lily as of August 1996. But that same production server was generating some SLCP-formatted messages by August 1998. This wasn't a full-blown SLCP implementation, but the messages were the same format which is still used for SLCP. It may be that developer versions of a lilyCore had implementations of SLCP well before that.


 <<O>>  Difference Topic HistoricalNotes (r1.2 - 29 Jan 2004 - ThePrisoner)

META TOPICPARENT DeveloperGuide
Some misc. historical stuff.

Changed:
<
<
-- CoKe - 01 Oct 2003
>
>
The question is occasionally asked "has anyone thought about using XML?" As a matter of fact - not exactly. But during the development of what became SLCP, this proposal was floated. The document it came from had an RCS tag indicating it was written on 29 Nov 1994.

 <<O>>  Difference Topic HistoricalNotes (r1.1 - 01 Oct 2003 - CoKe)
Line: 1 to 1
Added:
>
>
META TOPICPARENT DeveloperGuide
Some misc. historical stuff.

-- CoKe - 01 Oct 2003

View topic | Diffs | r1.4 | > | r1.3 | > | r1.2 | More
Revision r1.1 - 01 Oct 2003 - 22:19 - CoKe
Revision r1.4 - 05 Feb 2006 - 01:47 - GaranceDrosehn